Skip to main content

Abolish the RDAs! They bank on again...

Regional development agencies failing to help local enterprise - Telegraph
Matthew Elliott, Chief Executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance called for George Osborne, the Chancellor, to use this week’s Budget to abolish them altogether.
He said: "The Regional Development Agencies are hugely wasteful and ineffective, and they should all be abolished."

It seems Mr Elliott has an axe to grind here. His organisation has clearly ignored the last NAO report on the RDAs and the view of the LSE. It is clear that TPA's report is based on the "glass is half empty" philosophy. It is also written with a "sweep-all-with-one-brush" mentality and large doses of insinuations by use of examples, that all RDAs are the same.

Certain RDAs, if not all, produce a draft regional strategy which goes out to public and private bodies for consultation and input. It is also available to general public. Did the TPA ever got itself involved in helping to shape any of the regions via this document?

These pseudo know-it-alls do not actually present a well rounded picture of the situation and certainly only provide half hearted research, to make "informed comments". After decades of neglect, how can only 10 years turn things around for regions outside London. The fact that they are able to improve some aspects and stop the decline is praise enough.

Still when you are in the pockets of the Conservative Party what can you expect? We all know that the Tories have always wanted to abolish the RDAs. However,  after turning up in the North and seeing for themselves the real difference the RDAs have made to the lives of people here, the Lib-Cons released that their view was skewered by misinformation on a large scale and I wonder by whom...


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A ZDNet artical (02/11/06) explained the agreement between Novell and Microsoft. Its no wonder the Open Source and FSF community are suspicious. As the artical puts it these 'foes' are indeed forming an alliance, but against what? Is the alliance to deal with the (Microsoft's) customer demands as mentioned by Brad Smith? Is it to stave off the rise of CentOS and its counter part RedHat? With the biggest software company in the world plugging your software and optimising it to run on their software then which other linux vendor is getting squeezed?
Post a Comment
Read more
So Hugo Chavez thinks GW Bush is the devil.Well with the attempted coup that the CIA bungled, because Chavez refused to fall in line (see: www.venezuelasolidarity.org.uk) this is a lesson in how to increase your popularity at the expense of you boss...ahhem, cough, cough... fellow leader. Don't get me wrong Chavez has done great work in Bolivia and with Cuba but hitting someone when they are down (even if they are the bad guy) is a cheap trick (though the bad guys do it).
Post a Comment
Read more
So the Highway's Agency has decided to commence with work on widening the M1 to 'ease' traffic congestion. The No Widening M1 Alliance has stacks of evidence to say its not a good idea and the HA's own report says in the long run the widening of the M1 will only cause more traffic. So everyone is right! Right? If two wrongs don't make a right, surely two rights must make a right? A spokes person for the business transport alliance said on camera that businesses need the M1 widening to ensure the travel routes used by delivery trucks are "effect". That thousands of jobs are at stake if this infrastructure was not updated (not using his own words of course). And there are traffic management measure (like toll charges which the transport alliance support) that can be used to control the amount of traffic ensuring that in 2021 the problem does not reoccur (and the needle runs horiztonally across the vinyl make that comic sratching noise)... Did the penny just ...
Post a Comment
Read more